Friday, May 14, 2021

A Child Crying in the Night

A picture not to be forgotten ... look at the child, her grief, her fear, and tell me, please, that we have the right to do this, because this little girl and her mother, her mother hoping for something decent, good, and kind, are "illegal."

To all the "legal" immigrants who came to this land, including my own ancestors, don't ever protest your innocence - that you did it right, or that your ancestors did it so. 

It's just written laws, pieces of paper, political gerrymandering, that determine legal or illegal. 

But is there not a higher law? The law of God? The law of love? Human dignity and worth?

And if you tell me that "your gawd" wants this child to be frightened and alone, and her mother shamed and denied, then to hell with your gawd; I want nothing to do with that kind of religion, that kind of meanness and pride. Your gawd, if that's what you call it, is a sham, a figment of your own distorted notion of pride, privilege, and power.

I don't want to forget this picture, a picture of suffering, suffering much the product of misguided policies, economic manipulation, misogyny, and white nationalism.

There is a higher law, and we all know it. Every human being knows it, and only with tremendous effort can that law be denied and buried under the debris of hate.

There is a higher law, the very purpose of which is embedded in creation, in the covenant, the cross ... and in the words and art, the dreams and dance, of faith, hope, and love.

There is a higher law that declares all are legal in the sight of God - everyone has a right to the shade of their own fig tree, and it's the purpose of God, the work of love, to insure this ... and it's the task, too, of every human being in the position of some power, enough power to make a difference ... for the children of our world.

Wednesday, May 5, 2021

 "Foreign Affairs ... will tolerate wide differences of opinion. Its articles will not represent any consensus of beliefs. What is demanded of them is that they shall be competent and well informed, representing honest opinions seriously held and convincingly expressed.... It does not accept responsibility for the views in any articles, signed or unsigned, which appear in its pages. What it does accept is the responsibility for giving them a chance to appear." ~ Archibald Cary Coolidge, Founding Editor, Volume 1, Number 1, September, 1922.

Having just received the latest Foreign Affairs, while scanning the index, I saw the above quote, and thought of FaceBook and it's continuing ban on Trump.

Archibald Cox says it well ... wide diversity of opinion, but with some critical benchmarks: "competent," "well informed," "seriously held," and "convincingly expressed."

By Jessamyn - Own work,
CC BY-SA 4.0,
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=58697461

I thought about these criteria, and it's clear to me that Trump fails to meet all of them ... I paused at "seriously held," and asked, "Does Trump seriously hold the views he expresses? Does he sincerely believe what he says?"

Perhaps he does, but I suspect most of what he says reflects his desire for power, and a willingness to say and do anything to enhance his hold on the GOP. 

He may well "seriously hold" his views much like some who believe the earth to be flat, or the moon's made of green cheese.

I think FaceBook is right on this one ... though the Oversight Board recommends a thorough review and more clarity.



Sunday, May 2, 2021

Friendship

So many friends ...
my life enriched by folks
I've met only on social media - most
are expansive in their take on things,
appreciative of art and history, science and prayer ...
with room in their souls
for the world,
for diversity,
for the commonplace and the unusual ...
eager to learn ...
lovers of books ...
when's the next trip?
who will go?
all of us.
you bet.